ICU Fellowship Vivas – MH, Failure to Wean and Pancreatitis Dr Swapnil Pawar
Inguinal Hernia Dr Swapnil Pawar
Acute Pericarditis Dr Swapnil Pawar
Stopping Nasogastric feeds in ICU – Time for a CHANGE Dr Swapnil Pawar
Driving Pressure & Elastance – New Drivers in ARDS
Dr Swapnil Pawar
The respiratory system driving pressure or distending pressure is a crucial respiratory mechanical concept that represents how much pressure is transmitted in the respiratory system during tidal ventilation.
The elastance is the change is pressure over the change in volume. The normal value being < 1cmH2O/ml/kg.
It remains unknown whether the benefit of lowering VT differs between patients with high elastance (and high driving pressure) and patients with low elastance (and low driving pressure).
Gallagher et al undertook the study to establish whether the causal effect of lowering the VT of ventilation on mortality in randomized trials varied according to elastance.
Effect of Lowering VT on Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Varies with Respiratory System Elastance
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 203, Iss 11, pp 1378–1385, June 1, 2021
This study is a secondary analysis from previous randomized controlled trials comparing low vs. higher tidal volume ventilation. The study evaluated the association between elastance and the low tidal volume-related reduction in mortality. Data were included from 5 previous RCTs that compared low vs. higher Vt in ARDS (the same studies were used in the Amato et al. study). The following data were extracted:
Hypothesis: The mortality benefit of low tidal volume depends on the elastance. The mortality benefit of a low tidal volume is greater when the elastance is lower. The mortality benefit of a low tidal volume is less when the elastance is higher.
Based on a Bayesian logistic regression model to calculate the posterior probability of an interaction tidal volume and elastance on 60-day mortality. Adjustments were made for the severity of illness including the PaO2/FIO2 ratio, APACHE or Simplified Acute Physiology Score, and the mortality rate of the control group in each study.
A Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) technique was used for testing the frequentist hypothesis for interaction between tidal volumes and elastance regarding the difference in the absolute risk of mortality.
1202 patients enrolled from 5 RCTs.
Data were available from 1096 patients.
416 patients (38%) died on or before Day 60.
The mortality benefit of low tidal volume ventilation depended on the elastance. As the elastance increased, lower tidal volumes progressively reduced the risk of death. The posterior probability that the mortality benefit of ventilation with lower VT varied according to elastance was 93% (posterior median interaction OR, 0.80 per cm H2O/[ml/kg]; 90% CrI, 0.63 to 1.02) (Figure E4). The absolute risk reduction (ARR) associated with a lower-VT ventilation strategy increased progressively with increasing elastance (Figure 2).
Elastance: cm H2O/ (ml/kg)
Elastance Posterior probability of ARR of at least 1% More than 5%
Less than 2 55% 29%
2–3 82% 58%
More than 3 92% 82%
The mortality benefit of low tidal volume ventilation did not vary with the P/F ratio
The investigators used a Skeptical prior expressing skepticism that the effect of VT is unlikely to vary meaningfully with Ers (This is similar to the null hypothesis in the frequentist method). The Bayes factor for the one-sided null-hypothesis test of no interaction under the skeptical prior was 3.6, indicating substantial evidence against the null hypothesis (equivalent to P , 0.01 under conventional frequentist testing)
Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) technique was employed for a frequentist hypothesis test of the interaction between VT strategy and Ers. lower-VT ventilation on mortality also varied according to elastance (interaction, P=0.02)
not all published randomized trials of lower versus higher VT were included in this study.
It’s time to move away from the dogmatic practice of applying 6-8 ml/kg Vt to all patients with severe ARDS.
Plateau pressure <30 cm H2O alone is not a reliable marker in the management of patients with ARDS.
Driving pressure and elastance measurement should be a routine part of the ventilatory adjustment strategy.
The time spent > 15 cm H2O of driving pressure is more important than one absolute value.
Dr Swapnil Pawar July 14, 2021